کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
6358006 | 1622745 | 2014 | 11 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
The “one-out, all-out” principle entails the risk of imposing unnecessary restoration costs: A study case in two Mediterranean coastal lakes
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه
علوم زمین و سیارات
اقیانوس شناسی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
چکیده انگلیسی
The Water Framework Directive uses the “one-out, all-out” principle in assessing water bodies (i.e., the worst status of the elements used in the assessment determines the final status of the water body). In this study, we assessed the ecological status of two coastal lakes in Italy. Indices for all biological quality elements used in transitional waters from the Italian legislation and other European countries were employed and compared. Based on our analyses, the two lakes require restoration, despite the lush harbor seagrass beds, articulated macrobenthic communities and rich fish fauna. The “one-out, all-out” principle tends to inflate Type I errors, i.e., concludes that a water body is below the “good” status even if the water body actually has a “good” status. This may cause additional restoration costs where they are not necessarily needed. The results from this study strongly support the need for alternative approaches to the “one-out, all-out” principle.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Marine Pollution Bulletin - Volume 80, Issues 1â2, 15 March 2014, Pages 30-40
Journal: Marine Pollution Bulletin - Volume 80, Issues 1â2, 15 March 2014, Pages 30-40
نویسندگان
S. Prato, P. La Valle, E. De Luca, L. Lattanzi, G. Migliore, J.G. Morgana, C. Munari, L. Nicoletti, G. Izzo, M. Mistri,