Multiple approaches to date Japanese marker tephras using optical and ESR methods

- Optical dating of quartz and feldspar of tephra.
- ESR dating of volcanic quartz using Al and Ti-Li centres.
- pIR-IRSL SAR and pIR-IRSL MAAD provide consistent ages.
- Gamma ray irradiation does not induce change in ESR sensitivity.
- pIR-IRSL signal of volcanic feldspar is promising to date tephra.

The present study aimed to test reliability of luminescence and electron spin resonance (ESR) methods to date tephra. We investigated on three Japanese marker tephras, Ikeda-ko (6.4 ka), Aira-Tn (30 ka) and Aira-Iwato (45-50 ka). A systematic studies were performed using different minerals (quartz and feldspar), different grain fractions (75-250 and 250-500 μm), different luminescence and ESR signals, like optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) of quartz, infrared stimulated luminescence (IRSL) of feldspar, including recently developed least faded post infrared IRSL (pIR-IRSL), and ESR signals from paramagnetic centers Al and Ti-Li of quartz. Ages obtained using pIR-IRSL signal of plagioclase with preheat of 320 °C, 60 s and stimulation at 300 °C are consistent with the reference ages. High dose detection range (up to ∼600 Gy) and accurate age estimation enable pIR-IRSL of feldspar a promising methodology to date quaternary tephra. ESR ages from quartz are grossly correlated with the reference ages but large deviation and large associated errors are observed, possibly due to either low signal to noise ratio or heterogenous dose response of different aliquot in multiple aliquot additive dose (MAAD) approach.