کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3197653 1201866 2014 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Efficacy and safety of systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A systematic review
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری ایمنی شناسی و میکروب شناسی ایمونولوژی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Efficacy and safety of systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A systematic review
چکیده انگلیسی

BackgroundMany patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) require systemic immunomodulating treatment to achieve adequate disease control.ObjectiveWe sought to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe AD.MethodsA systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL (until June 2012). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating systemic immunomodulating treatments for moderate-to-severe AD were included. Selection, data extraction, quality assessment, and generation of treatment recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach were performed independently by 2 reviewers. Efficacy outcomes were clinical signs, symptoms, quality of life, and the course of AD. Safety data were compared by calculating the weekly incidence rates (as percentages) for adverse events.ResultsThirty-four RCTs with 12 different systemic treatments and totaling 1653 patients were included. Fourteen trials consistently indicate that cyclosporin A efficaciously improves clinical signs of AD. Cyclosporin A is recommended as first-line treatment for short-term use. A second-line treatment option is azathioprine, but efficacy is lower, and evidence is weaker. Methotrexate can be considered a third-line treatment option. Recommendations are impossible for mycophenolate, montelukast, intravenous immunoglobulins, and systemic glucocorticosteroids because of limited evidence. A meta-analysis was not performed because of a lack of standardization in outcome measures.ConclusionAlthough 12 different interventions for moderate-to-severe AD have been studied in 34 RCTs, strong recommendations are only possible for the short-term use of cyclosporin A. Methodological limitations in the majority of trials prevent evidence-based conclusions. Large head-to-head trials evaluating long-term treatments are required.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology - Volume 133, Issue 2, February 2014, Pages 429–438
نویسندگان
, , , , ,