کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
3202904 | 1201981 | 2006 | 6 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

BackgroundChestnut allergy has been almost exclusively considered in the context of the latex-fruit syndrome. Chestnut allergens not linked to latex hypersensitivity have not been studied.ObjectiveWe sought to explore whether differences in sensitization patterns between chestnut allergy with or without associated latex-fruit syndrome can be detected.MethodsTwelve patients sensitized to chestnut but not to latex and 3 control patients with latex-chestnut allergy were analyzed. A major chestnut allergen was purified and characterized. IgE immunoblotting, specific IgE determination, and skin prick tests with 5 isolated allergens involved in food allergy or latex-fruit syndrome were also performed.ResultsA major 9-kd allergen was detected in chestnut extract, isolated, and identified as lipid transfer protein (LTP) Cas s 8. Specific IgE to this allergen was found in 91% (by means of IgE immunoblotting) and 58% (by means of ELISA) of sera from patients with chestnut but not latex allergy. Moreover, 66% of these patients had positive skin prick test responses to Cas s 8. Additionally, allergenic LTPs from peach fruit and Artemisia vulgaris pollen were also reactive. In contrast, avocado class I chitinase and latex hevein, allergens associated with the latex-fruit syndrome, showed no reaction. The opposite situation was exhibited by patients with latex-chestnut allergy.ConclusionsPatients with chestnut allergy with or without associated latex hypersensitivity present different patterns of major allergens (LTPs and class I chitinases, respectively).Clinical implicationsLTPs and class I chitinases can be used as diagnostic tools in patients with chestnut allergy to predict whether an associated latex sensitization and a risk of potential cross-reactivity with other plant foods and pollens exist.
Journal: Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology - Volume 118, Issue 3, September 2006, Pages 705–710