To ablate or not: A proposal regarding nomenclature

BackgroundVague and inexact word usage can complicate conversations about cutaneous energy devices, especially novel technologies.ObjectiveTo identify some areas in which descriptions of lasers, lights, and energy devices can be improved.MethodsAmbiguities in descriptions of energy devices are addressed by suggesting sets of modifiers that are precise, accurate, simple, and mutually exclusive.ResultsTerms are proposed for distinguishing between devices that induce skin injuries of different depths. Additionally, descriptors are suggested for fractional treatments, fat melting, and cellulite reduction. Finally, we propose a scheme for clearly naming the underlying technology associated with any cutaneous energy device.LimitationsNovel devices yet to be invented may not fit into the designations proposed and may require additional categories.ConclusionsSimple changes in word usage may facilitate rapid and accurate communication regarding lasers, lights, and other energy devices.