کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4684017 1635383 2016 9 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Vanishing point: Scale independence in geomorphological hierarchies
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
نقطه ناپدید شدن: استقلال مقیاس در سلسله مراتب ژئومورفولوژیکی
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه علوم زمین و سیارات فرآیندهای سطح زمین
چکیده انگلیسی


• Vanishing point: scale domain distance at which subsystems are independent.
• Graph theory analysis of archetype and example geomorphological hierarchies
• Relatedness decreases rapidly as more hierarchical levels are considered.
• Supports stepwise rather than seamless bottom-up or top-down scale linkage

Scale linkage problems in geosciences are often associated with a hierarchy of components. Both dynamical systems perspectives and intuition suggest that processes or relationships operating at fundamentally different scales are independent with respect to influences on system dynamics. But how far apart is “fundamentally different”—that is, what is the “vanishing point” at which scales are no longer interdependent? And how do we reconcile that with the idea (again, supported by both theory and intuition) that we can work our way along scale hierarchies from microscale to planetary (and vice-versa)? Graph and network theory are employed here to address these questions. Analysis of two archetypal hierarchical networks shows low algebraic connectivity, indicating low levels of inferential synchronization. This explains the apparent paradox between scale independence and hierarchical linkages. Incorporating more hierarchical levels results in an increase in complexity or entropy of the network as a whole, but at a nonlinear rate. Complexity increases as a power α of the number of levels in the hierarchy, with α < 1 and usually ≤ 0.6. However, algebraic connectivity decreases at a more rapid rate. Thus, the ability to infer one part of the hierarchical network from other level decays rapidly as more levels are added. Relatedness among system components decreases with differences in scale or resolution, analogous to distance decay in the spatial domain. These findings suggest a strategy of identifying and focusing on the most important or interesting scale levels, rather than attempting to identify the smallest or largest scale levels and work top-down or bottom-up from there. Examples are given from soil geomorphology and karst flow networks.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Geomorphology - Volume 266, 1 August 2016, Pages 66–74
نویسندگان
,